What is one criterion that qualifies an individual as an illegal entrant under INA 212(a)(6)?

An individual qualifies as an illegal entrant under INA 212(a)(6) primarily due to their failure to attend a removal proceeding. This criterion highlights the importance placed on compliance with immigration processes; failing to appear for such proceedings can indicate an individual's intention to avoid legal scrutiny regarding their immigration status.

When an individual fails to attend a scheduled removal hearing, they may be found to have abandoned their opportunity to contest their immigration status. This absence can lead to the issuance of an in absentia removal order, resulting in their classification as an illegal entrant because they are no longer participating in the legal immigration process. This criterion reflects the U.S. government's interest in maintaining an orderly immigration system and ensuring that individuals adhere to legal procedures.

In contrast, possessing a valid visa and being a current U.S. citizen would not qualify someone as an illegal entrant, as both situations align with legal entry into the country. Similarly, merely claiming asylum status does not automatically render someone an illegal entrant, as this claim can be part of a lawful process for those seeking protection.